In a recent turn of events, Donald Trump has initiated the replacement of the acting commissioner of the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) following complaints from treasury secretary Scott Bessent. Reportedly, Bessent raised concerns to the president regarding the appointment of Gary Shapley as the interim head of the IRS, allegedly orchestrated by Doge leader Elon Musk without Bessent’s knowledge. The New York Times reported that Bessent felt bypassed by this appointment process, which was facilitated through White House channels, prompting Trump’s approval to reverse the decision.

Michael Faulkender, the current deputy treasury secretary, is anticipated to step into the role of acting head of the IRS, while Missouri congressman Billy Long has been nominated by Trump for the permanent position, pending Senate approval. Notably, Long’s nomination has stirred controversy as it was revealed that his substantial personal debt was mysteriously paid off through campaign contributions following Trump’s announcement.

The situation further unfolds against the backdrop of internal power struggles, as evidenced by social media interactions between Bessent and Musk, with Musk echoing accusations of collaboration against Bessent. Meanwhile, amidst these conflicts, the IRS is reportedly considering revoking Harvard University’s tax-exempt status under pressure from the Trump administration, despite legal constraints on presidential influence over IRS investigations.

The evolving dynamics within the IRS leadership underscore the complexities and tensions surrounding governmental appointments and decision-making processes, reflecting a broader landscape of political maneuvering and conflicting interests at play.