In a House Judiciary Committee deposition, former Justice Department national security prosecutor Jay Bratt invoked his Fifth Amendment right amid the classified documents case against ex-President Donald Trump. Bratt’s spokesperson, Peter Carr, suggested the government had targeted him, leading to Bratt’s decision to remain silent. This move raised concerns about the government’s use of power against perceived political enemies.

Bratt’s involvement in the case, where Trump faced allegations of taking classified documents from the White House post-presidency, ended with his retirement in January 2025. The Trump administration’s dismissal of Justice Department officials involved in Trump’s investigations added to the contentious atmosphere.

Despite public perception, invoking the Fifth Amendment is a constitutional right to avoid self-incrimination rather than an admission of guilt. Bratt’s silence during the deposition drew minimal comments from GOP Rep. Andy Biggs, hinting at the ongoing tensions surrounding the investigation.

The Trump administration’s aggressive stance towards prosecutors probing Trump is evident in the establishment of a “Weaponization Working Group.” This group, led by Ed Martin, aims to scrutinize investigations related to Trump’s alleged election interference and handling of classified documents. Attorney General Pam Bondi’s prior statements foreshadowed repercussions for those involved in investigating Trump.

Carr emphasized that Bratt’s involvement in the case was driven by evidence of law and national security breaches rather than personal choice. The unfolding events highlight the complex interplay between political power, legal proceedings, and the pursuit of justice in high-profile cases.