In a tense showdown between California leaders and President Donald Trump, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted Trump the ability to maintain control of California’s National Guard in Los Angeles amidst ongoing protests. This decision temporarily overturned a federal judge’s ruling that deemed Trump’s deployment of the Guard as unlawful, signaling a potential escalation in the military presence in the city. Governor Gavin Newsom’s legal challenge against the unauthorized deployment was met with this setback, amplifying tensions with protesters.

The deployment of additional Marines to Los Angeles further heightened the situation following a week of unrest triggered by immigration raids. The court’s decision, while not a final verdict in favor of Trump, allows him to retain control of the National Guard pending further legal deliberations. Trump justified his actions by claiming that sending troops prevented the city from descending into chaos.

In response to Trump’s military deployment, a Reuters/Ipsos poll revealed a divided American public, with Republicans supporting the use of troops to restore order during protests while Democrats opposed the measure. The situation in Los Angeles prompted Walmart heiress Christy Walton to place an ad in The New York Times urging participation in nationwide protests against the administration, drawing criticism from Trump supporters.

As protests spread across the country, California’s unrest led to a partial curfew in downtown Los Angeles, with law enforcement responding to reports of violence. The planned ‘No Kings’ protests scheduled for June 14 gained momentum, with organizers anticipating a significant turnout to oppose what they view as Trump’s authoritarian actions. This escalating situation underscores the deep divisions and tensions surrounding immigration enforcement and civil liberties in the United States.