The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, rejected the Trump administration’s bid to withhold billions in foreign aid approved by Congress. While the court did not specify an immediate release date, it allowed the White House to challenge the issue in lower courts. The majority emphasized the need for lower courts to determine the government’s obligations to comply with prior court orders regarding the aid.
Four conservative justices dissented, expressing concern over the court’s decision to unfreeze the aid. The case revolves around billions in foreign aid frozen by Trump in January, sparking a legal battle with nonprofit groups arguing that such actions undermined Congressional spending control and violated federal laws.
The Trump administration’s rush to the Supreme Court came after a district judge’s order to release the aid by a certain deadline. The administration cited challenges in processing the payments promptly. Meanwhile, groups suing the administration accused it of noncompliance with court orders.
Chief Justice Roberts granted a temporary stay, allowing time for written arguments. The case involves organizations like the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition and the Global Health Council, challenging the aid freeze impacting health programs worldwide. The Trump administration revealed plans to terminate a vast majority of USAID awards, affecting aid programs and workforce stability.
The ruling sets the stage for potential further legal battles and indicates a divided court on Trump-related cases. The decision’s implications extend beyond the aid dispute, reflecting broader executive power struggles and reshaping initiatives.
