Democrats are rallying around the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia as a symbol of American ideals like due process and preventing government overreach, while the Trump administration and Republicans focus on the perceived threat posed by foreigners and gangs. Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran man mistakenly deported and imprisoned without communication, has become a focal point for Democrats in challenging President Trump’s immigration policies. Despite a Supreme Court order for his return to the U.S., the Trump administration is resisting, accusing Democrats of defending a supposed gang member.

Previously divided on immigration strategy, many Democrats are now uniting behind the Abrego Garcia case, with high-profile figures like Senator Chris Van Hollen and Hillary Clinton getting involved. The Trump administration justifies its position by labeling Abrego Garcia as a “terrorist” and an MS-13 gang member, despite lacking evidence of criminal charges in the U.S. Trump staunchly defends his administration’s actions, emphasizing his commitment to deporting criminals.

While immigration is a perceived strength for Trump, his defiance of court rulings may pose challenges as public opinion leans towards expecting adherence to legal decisions. Democrats like Rep. Glenn Ivey view the case as not just an immigration issue but also a constitutional one, highlighting the broader implications at stake. The dichotomy between the two parties’ stances on this case underscores deeper ideological divides and the ongoing debate over immigration policy in the U.S.