A federal judge in Rhode Island, John McConnell, has extended a block preventing the Trump administration from freezing grants and loans worth trillions of dollars. The lawsuit filed by nearly two dozen Democratic states raised concerns over the administration’s plan for a broad pause on federal spending, leading to confusion and anxiety. McConnell’s ruling criticized the executive branch for attempting to supersede Congress, stating that such actions undermine the constitutional roles of each government branch. He emphasized that the administration lacked the authority to impose a categorical freeze without specific congressional approval.

The states highlighted the detrimental impact of delayed federal funds on various programs and services, demonstrating the urgency of the situation. McConnell acknowledged the states’ standing in the case, noting the tangible harm caused by the funding pause, including disruptions to essential services and environmental initiatives. The frozen funds were intended for projects such as rooftop solar power, electric heat pump water heaters for low-income households, and grants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

While the White House cited alignment with President Trump’s agenda for the funding halt, the administration later rescinded the memo outlining the freeze. Despite this, federal agencies continued to withhold funding, prompting legal interventions. Another federal judge, Loren AliKhan in Washington, also extended an order blocking the funding freeze, responding to requests from nonprofit organizations and small businesses. The legal battles reflect the ongoing struggle to ensure the proper allocation of federal funds and uphold the separation of powers outlined in the Constitution.