In a recent ruling, a federal judge declared that former President Donald Trump lacked the authority to dismiss Merit Systems Protection Board member Cathy Harris without cause. Harris, a nominee of President Joe Biden, took legal action to retain her position after being informed of her termination by the White House. Judge Rudolph Contreras emphasized that Trump’s attempt to remove Harris was unlawful as it did not align with the stipulated criteria of inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.
The court granted a permanent injunction in favor of Harris, allowing her to continue leading the board until a final decision is reached. This ruling echoes a similar case where another judge found Trump’s dismissal of the head of a federal watchdog agency to be unlawful. The legal battle underscores the importance of safeguarding the independence of government agencies from political interference.
Harris, who has chaired the board since March 2021, was notified of her firing in February 2022, alongside the retirement of another board member. The legal dispute revolves around the interpretation of congressional provisions dictating the removal of board members. While government attorneys argued for Trump’s authority to make staffing decisions, Harris’ legal team emphasized the need for impartiality and confidence in the board’s operations.
As the case unfolds, it raises broader questions about the balance of power between the executive branch and independent agencies tasked with upholding government integrity. The outcome will not only impact the future composition of the Merit Systems Protection Board but also set precedents for the accountability and autonomy of federal entities in the face of political transitions.