The Trump administration’s decision to slash 90% of USAID’s foreign aid contracts has sparked shock and outrage among health groups and NGOs worldwide. This abrupt move, following a 90-day spending review, will have far-reaching consequences, leading to the collapse of crucial humanitarian programs that combat hunger, disease, and provide life-saving assistance to millions. Organizations receiving USAID funding were blindsided by termination letters that abruptly ended their programs, totaling around 10,000 contracts.

Critics have condemned the administration’s decision, warning of dire consequences such as increased suffering, instability, and desperation, rather than enhancing American security or prosperity. The move is seen as a significant setback in America’s global influence, potentially ceding ground to rival nations like China, Russia, and Iran. In South Africa, the impact of the cuts on HIV programs funded by USAID has been particularly severe, jeopardizing life-saving services for millions in need of treatment.

President Trump and his ally Elon Musk have been vocal about their disdain for foreign aid, viewing USAID projects as wasteful and aligned with a liberal agenda. Despite efforts to save funding for vital services through waiver programs, many crucial programs have suffered permanent funding cuts. The administration’s swift and drastic actions to freeze aid, terminate contracts, and remove USAID staff have raised concerns about the long-term implications on global health, security, and humanitarian efforts.

The controversial decision has drawn criticism from various quarters, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability in shaping foreign assistance policies. As the repercussions of these cuts unfold, the global community is grappling with the potential humanitarian crisis that may result from the dismantling of essential aid programs.