In his presidential campaigns, Donald Trump emphasized the need to end “endless” wars and prioritize a foreign policy that puts America first. However, his recent decision to strike Iranian nuclear sites contradicts his previous stance and risks entangling the U.S. in conflicts he once criticized. This move has sparked division within his own supporters, with some prominent members of the “Make America Great Again” movement expressing criticism.

Throughout his campaigns and first term, Trump consistently highlighted his anti-interventionist approach, vowing to break away from the cycle of perpetual wars. He clashed with advisers, including national security adviser John Bolton, over involvement in global affairs, particularly regarding Iran and Afghanistan. Trump’s tweets in response to Turkey’s military operation in Syria underscored his commitment to ending what he referred to as “ENDLESS WARS.”

During the 2016 and 2024 campaigns, Trump denounced U.S. military involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan, labeling them as costly mistakes. Despite his evolving views, Trump’s past writings reveal a nuanced stance on military action, indicating a willingness to consider pre-emptive strikes based on national security concerns.

Trump’s shifting rhetoric on war and foreign policy reflects the complexities of navigating international relations while staying true to his “America first” agenda. His actions and statements underscore the challenges of balancing campaign promises with geopolitical realities.