Columbia University has come under scrutiny for its disciplinary actions against students who have expressed criticism of Israel. The university’s new disciplinary committee, the Office of Institutional Equity, has initiated investigations targeting students for various activities, including social media posts supporting Palestine and hosting off-campus events related to the Palestinian movement.

One student, Maryam Alwan, faced accusations of harassment for writing an op-ed calling for divestment from Israel in the student newspaper. The university warned of possible sanctions ranging from a warning to expulsion for violating school policy. Critics argue that the university’s response is influenced by external pressures, such as threats to funding from President Donald Trump and federal agencies.

The disciplinary process, conducted in secrecy, involves students signing non-disclosure agreements and facing accusations based on unclear guidelines. Some students, like Mahmoud Khalil, have been accused of misconduct without clear evidence, leading to threats affecting their academic progress.

The university’s actions have sparked concerns among students, faculty, and free speech advocates, with some accusing Columbia of stifling protected speech and prioritizing institutional interests over those of its community members. The disciplinary push has also reignited pro-Palestinian activism on campus, with recent protests and building occupations at Barnard College, an affiliate of Columbia University.

As the university faces scrutiny and backlash, the unfolding situation underscores the complex dynamics surrounding free speech, academic freedom, and activism within the higher education landscape.