The Senate Judiciary Committee reviewed Ed Martin, President Donald Trump’s nominee for US attorney for Washington, DC, and found discrepancies in his responses regarding his past controversial statements. Martin distanced himself from inflammatory rhetoric on Democrats, the Capitol riot, and the election. He avoided confirming violence on January 6, 2021, and the election’s legitimacy. Despite pledging against white nationalism, he associated with such groups. Martin failed to disclose appearances on a racist website and praised white nationalists. His nomination faces Democratic opposition due to his controversial background and actions as interim US attorney. Martin’s lack of transparency in media disclosures and contradictory statements have raised concerns, prompting calls for live testimony. His responses to the committee revealed evasiveness and memory lapses. Martin’s refusal to provide clear answers on sensitive issues like the election, violence at the Capitol, and his past statements has drawn criticism. The article highlights Martin’s controversial associations, statements, and actions that have fueled the debate around his nomination.