The article highlights President Donald Trump’s controversial plans to shut down the US Agency for International Development (USAID) without congressional approval. This unprecedented move has raised concerns among legal experts and politicians, who view it as a challenge to established legal and political norms. Despite lacking a specific executive order, Trump’s administration signaled the agency’s closure, prompting Secretary of State Marco Rubio to appoint an acting administrator for USAID.

The potential closure of USAID, a vital agency that provides aid worldwide, has sparked debates on the separation of powers between the President and Congress. Legal experts emphasize that the President cannot unilaterally abolish an agency established by Congress without legislative approval, highlighting the constitutional implications of such actions.

The move to dismantle USAID is seen as a test for the Republican-controlled Congress’s willingness to check the President’s authority. Critics argue that this move may pave the way for further attempts to reshape the government bureaucracy, raising concerns about the erosion of Congressional oversight.

Democrats have voiced strong opposition to the shutdown plans, labeling them as unlawful and signaling potential legal challenges. Despite the uncertainty surrounding the legal recourse, lawmakers and experts anticipate potential legal battles from affected parties, such as entities with contracts and employees of USAID.

Overall, the article sheds light on the complex interplay between the executive and legislative branches, underscoring the importance of constitutional checks and balances in a democratic system.