The U.S. Supreme Court recently heard a case challenging the provision granting automatic citizenship to babies born in the United States. The focus of the arguments shifted to the issue of whether federal district court judges can issue nationwide injunctions against the administration. Justices displayed divided opinions during the hearing, with some questioning the administration’s stance on limiting judicial power. Justice Kavanaugh raised practical concerns about enforcing the administration’s order, while Justice Brown Jackson criticized the potential implications on individual rights. On the other hand, Justice Clarence Thomas seemed more open to the government’s argument. New Jersey Solicitor General and other representatives argued for the availability of nationwide injunctions in specific cases like this one. The case involves states suing the government over birthright citizenship. President Trump’s executive order, which challenges automatic citizenship for certain babies born in the U.S., sparked legal challenges and judicial rulings against its constitutionality. Despite limited support for Trump’s claim, the administration brought the case to the Supreme Court, focusing on the authority of district court judges. The evolving nature of this case indicates ongoing legal developments.