The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is requesting sensitive, personal data from millions of food assistance recipients, with one payment processor indicating its intention to comply. Privacy advocates argue that this demand for state data by the USDA is unprecedented and potentially unlawful, raising concerns about government access to traditionally state-maintained data. The controversy surrounds data from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) as Republican lawmakers propose significant cuts to the program.

The USDA’s directive, issued under President Trump’s executive order, requires personal data like names, addresses, and Social Security numbers from SNAP applicants and recipients. Critics warn that this move could pave the way for extensive government surveillance. Fidelity Information Services (FIS), a major SNAP payment processor, has signaled its compliance with the USDA’s request, citing contractual obligations.

Legal groups have raised objections to the USDA’s data demand, citing violations of federal laws like the Privacy Act and the agency’s own legal requirements. Conduent, another key payment processor, emphasized the importance of data privacy and stated they are working with clients regarding the USDA’s request. States are reviewing the data request cautiously, with concerns about potential data sharing among federal agencies in violation of privacy laws.

The situation underscores ongoing debates around data access and privacy, with various federal lawsuits challenging government agencies’ access to sensitive personal information. As stakeholders navigate these complex issues, the balance between data access for program integrity and individual privacy remains a key concern.