A New York federal judge is set to address critical issues in the case of Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University graduate facing deportation by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) due to his involvement in Gaza solidarity protests. Despite holding a green card as a legal U.S. resident, Khalil faces removal for his protest activities, which the Trump administration links to anti-Semitism and terrorism. Khalil, who was arrested at his New York City apartment, is currently detained in Louisiana, far from his pregnant wife. His lawyers have filed a habeas corpus challenge, and a hearing is scheduled to determine his status.

Green card holders like Khalil enjoy certain rights, including free speech protection under the First Amendment. However, the government can revoke green card status for various reasons, including allegations of terrorism support. The government’s stance is based on claims that Khalil’s actions align with Hamas, a designated terrorist group. The case underscores the broad powers the government holds over non-citizens in civil immigration cases, where defendants have fewer legal protections compared to criminal trials.

Khalil’s situation raises concerns about due process, as detainees in civil cases may not have the right to an attorney provided by the government. His remote detainment in Louisiana poses challenges in mounting a defense and accessing support. The move to a distant state is seen as a tactic to hinder the defense’s efforts and potentially seek a favorable court venue. Khalil’s case serves as a focal point in the debate over immigration policies and the rights of non-citizen residents in the U.S.