President Trump has been aggressively reshaping the system of checks on presidential power since taking office, sparking legal battles and concerns among government watchdogs. His actions include challenging the Justice Department’s independence, firing inspectors general, and attempting to control independent agencies like the SEC and FEC. Supporters argue that Trump is embracing the “unitary executive theory,” which advocates for concentrated presidential power to enable quick and decisive action. The administration believes that the president, as the elected leader, should have ultimate authority over the executive branch.

Critics, however, warn of the dangers of unchecked presidential power, pointing out the potential for corruption and abuse. Trump’s actions have raised alarms among watchdog groups, who fear a weakening of government safeguards against misconduct. Despite public sentiment favoring the current separation of powers, Trump’s efforts to expand executive authority face legal challenges in over 100 court cases. The administration is strategically testing the limits of presidential power, aiming to bring key cases before a conservative-leaning Supreme Court.

If successful, Trump’s efforts could significantly alter the balance of power in American politics, with implications for future administrations. While accountability mechanisms like elections and congressional oversight remain, the current political landscape presents challenges to curbing presidential power. The ongoing legal battles and debates surrounding Trump’s actions underscore the broader implications of his attempts to reshape the system of checks and balances.