Bill Maher, a vocal critic of Donald Trump, found himself at the center of controversy after praising his dinner experience with the US president. Larry David, in a satirical piece for The New York Times, likened Maher’s glowing account to dining with Adolf Hitler, sparking a response from Maher. Despite his past criticism of Trump, Maher described the president as “gracious” and “self-aware” following their dinner. David, in his piece, portrayed a critic of Hitler who ends up finding common ground with the dictator after accepting a dinner invitation.

In response, Maher expressed his disappointment in David’s comparison, highlighting the gravity of equating anyone to Hitler, especially in light of the atrocities committed by the dictator. Maher defended his decision to engage with Trump, emphasizing the importance of dialogue and communication with those we may disagree with. He acknowledged his friendship with David and expressed hope for reconciliation despite the disagreement.

Maher reiterated his steadfast criticism of Trump, emphasizing that meeting the president in person did not change his views. He emphasized the need for constructive discourse instead of resorting to insults, underscoring his belief in engaging with differing perspectives. Despite the tension between Maher and David, Maher remained open to the possibility of reconciliation and dialogue, emphasizing the importance of communication even in the face of disagreement.