The US Supreme Court’s recent decision to uphold Tennessee’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors has ignited widespread concern among legal analysts and healthcare professionals. This ruling is expected to have far-reaching implications not only for transgender and non-binary individuals but also for those advocating against sex-based discrimination.

Currently, 40% of transgender youths in the US reside in states with existing bans or restrictions on gender-affirming care. Despite numerous legal challenges, many of these bans remain in effect, and the latest ruling in United States v Skrmetti could set a precedent for the enforcement of similar laws.

The decision has left experts like Meredithe McNamara deeply troubled, emphasizing the negative impact on transgender individuals of all ages. Studies, such as the one conducted by the Trevor Project, have linked anti-trans laws to a significant increase in suicide attempts among transgender and non-binary youth.

The case revolved around whether Tennessee’s ban constituted sex-based discrimination, with Chief Justice John Roberts arguing that it did not warrant heightened scrutiny under the equal protection clause. In contrast, Justice Sonia Sotomayor criticized the majority’s stance, highlighting the discriminatory nature of the law based on assigned birth sex.

Legal experts warn that the ruling could weaken protections against sex-based discrimination in various contexts, potentially affecting cases related to abortion, pregnancy discrimination, and women’s rights. Despite the setback, advocates like Chase Strangio from the ACLU remain resolute in defending the rights and healthcare access of transgender individuals and their allies.