In a pivotal moment between Iran and the US, the choice between negotiations and war looms large. Initially obstructed by President Trump’s withdrawal from the nuclear agreement, recent signals indicated a willingness for dialogue. However, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s push for conflict seems to have swayed Trump towards the warpath. Despite Trump’s potential to influence Netanyahu, he has aligned with him instead.

The original deal proposed by Trump aimed to exchange sanctions relief for Iran’s nuclear disarmament, mutually benefiting both nations. This agreement could have curbed Iran’s nuclear ambitions, lessening global tensions and fostering energy market stability. Furthermore, improved US-Iran relations would have complicated Iran’s alliances with Russia and China. However, Netanyahu’s interference disrupted these negotiations, claiming an imminent nuclear threat from Iran.

The recent military strikes by Israel may temporarily setback Iran’s nuclear program, but history suggests they won’t be a lasting solution. While Trump initially distanced the US from the attacks, he now seeks to leverage them for a deal with Iran. This alignment with Israel risks entangling the US in conflict and may not coerce Tehran into negotiations due to domestic political considerations.

Israel’s bold move underscores a trend of US partners taking charge in global affairs, challenging Trump’s foreign policy objectives. Without a coherent foreign policy strategy, the US risks being dragged into conflicts that do not serve its interests. The need for disciplined leadership to steer US foreign policy towards stability and diplomacy is paramount to avoid further entanglements.