Aid groups are expressing concern over US efforts to compel them to accept Israel’s proposal for limited humanitarian aid delivery to Gaza under strict conditions. The Trump administration is reportedly pressuring international agencies, including the United Nations’ World Food Programme (WFP), to comply with Israel’s stringent rules for aid distribution in the war-torn region.

The blockade imposed by the Israel Defense Forces following a ceasefire collapse has left Gaza’s 2.3 million residents on the brink of starvation. The proposed aid plan, facilitated by the newly established Gaza Humanitarian Foundation based in Geneva, involves aid delivery to designated hubs where recipients must collect it under the supervision of US security contractors using facial recognition technology.

Despite Israel’s claims that these measures are necessary to prevent aid diversion to Hamas, aid organizations have raised objections, citing concerns about violating humanitarian principles and international law. Some fear complicity in potential war crimes related to forced displacement and internment.

Opposition to the aid scheme remains strong, with organizations like World Central Kitchen and the WFP struggling to replenish supplies for the population. Critics argue that the proposed centralized and militarized aid delivery model may exclude many in need and deter individuals from accessing assistance due to security concerns.

While the Trump administration emphasizes the urgency of providing aid to Gaza, critics question the effectiveness of the proposed approach and advocate for lifting restrictions to ensure safe and efficient humanitarian assistance delivery. The tension between humanitarian principles, security considerations, and political agendas underscores the complex dynamics at play in addressing the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.