The article explores the dilemma faced by media personalities and celebrities in the United States when invited to the White House by President Trump. Despite initial opposition to Trump, many find it hard to resist the allure of such an invitation, citing reasons like respect for the office of the president and the opportunity to engage directly with power rather than boycotting. However, the real question arises after the meeting – will they maintain their critical stance or soften their resistance?

The piece highlights comedian Bill Maher’s shift in tone after dining with Trump, going from a fierce critic to praising the president’s charm and humor. Maher’s change of heart has been criticized as a misstep, with many viewing him as an easy target for Trump’s engagement tactics. The broader trend of celebrities softening their resistance to Trump is also noted, with examples like George Clooney’s silence on Joe Biden and Ellen DeGeneres moving to the Cotswolds.

The article concludes by pointing out the complexities of pushing back against Trump and the varied responses of individuals, from Rosie O’Donnell moving to Ireland to Yale professors relocating to Canada. Maher’s experience serves as a cautionary tale, suggesting that there are better ways to navigate the challenges of engaging with or resisting the Trump administration.

Ultimately, the article raises important questions about the balance between engagement and resistance in the face of political power, urging individuals to consider their actions carefully in such fraught political climates.