The Trump administration’s recent decision to place the majority of U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) personnel on paid leave and eliminate around 2,000 positions in the U.S. has sparked significant controversy. This move, spearheaded by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, is seen as a blow to USAID, a key tool for U.S. soft power and foreign assistance.

A federal judge’s ruling paved the way for placing thousands of USAID workers on leave, drawing criticism from former senior officials who highlight the expertise and crisis response capacity being lost. The impact of these cuts is far-reaching, affecting vital areas such as disease outbreaks, population displacement, and humanitarian aid efforts.

President Trump’s 90-day freeze on foreign aid has halted funding for crucial programs combating starvation, diseases, and supporting displaced populations worldwide. While some exemptions totaling $5.3 billion have been approved, primarily for security and counter-narcotics initiatives, humanitarian relief through USAID has received limited support, with less than $100 million in exemptions compared to the annual $40 billion budget pre-freeze.

The implications of these cutbacks are significant, raising concerns about the U.S.’s ability to respond effectively to global crises and maintain its influence abroad. As debates continue on the necessity and impact of USAID, the future of American foreign assistance and soft power remains uncertain.