Former federal Judge Kathleen O’Malley and others are advocating for increased funding for federal judicial security in response to a concerning rise in threats. Despite judges testifying about escalating threats, some House Republicans, particularly those critical of judges holding Trump accountable, are resisting the funding increase. O’Malley, with her extensive experience on the bench, highlighted the importance of having support from the U.S. Department of Justice when facing threats.

The judiciary’s budget request includes a significant boost for security, reflecting the current threat environment. O’Malley observed a shift during Trump’s administration, where attacks on judges and criticism through social media aimed to intimidate them and influence their decisions. The push for more funding faces opposition from Republicans like Rep. Jim Jordan and Rep. Chip Roy, who have downplayed the need for increased security.

Judges have emphasized the urgency of the situation to Congress, pointing out the dynamic and worrisome threat environment they are facing. The judiciary’s budget request for FY 2026 includes a substantial increase for security funding, supported by testimonies from judges like Amy St. Eve and Robert Conrad Jr. Despite pushback from some lawmakers, the need to protect judges from threats and intimidation is crucial for upholding the rule of law. It is evident that an increase in security funding for federal judges is necessary and long overdue in ensuring the safety and independence of the judiciary.