President Donald Trump criticized Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, a fellow Republican, for opposing U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Massie, known for his non-interventionist stance, questioned the constitutionality of the military action and criticized the influence of neocons and the military-industrial complex. Trump, in response, attacked Massie on social media, labeling him as a “negative force” and a “lightweight” congressman.

Massie, along with Rep. Ro Khanna, introduced a resolution to prevent U.S. involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict without Congressional approval. Trump, however, lauded the airstrikes as a “spectacular military success” and lambasted Massie for his dissenting votes, including against a recent tax bill.

The clash between Trump and Massie underscores the division within the Republican Party regarding foreign policy and military intervention. Trump’s threat to support Massie’s primary opponent reflects his push for party unity and loyalty to his administration’s policies. Massie’s position as a vocal critic of interventionist actions highlights the ongoing debate within the GOP on the appropriate approach to foreign conflicts.

As the Republican primary approaches, the rift between Trump’s loyalists and more independent voices like Massie may deepen, shaping the party’s future direction on matters of national security and foreign policy.